Integral ShamWow! or: How We Learned to Stop Worrying and Love (or at least Tolerate) the Hype [VIDEO]

Terry and Marco's picture

We’ve long been considering the role of marketing in the integral movement. The images, stories, values, and ideologies communicated by marketing are ubiquitous and affect us on multiple levels — some of which we’re not even aware of. As postmoderns, we’ve learned to be skeptical of all marketing and marketers. We’re reflexively suspicious, and guarded. Yet at the same time, we delight in some forms of over-the-top advertising, like Super Bowl commercials. We admire cultural wizards like Steve Jobs and the mystique he created around his products — even though we know that behind the scenes, for instance in his interpersonal brutality, and in the working conditions in the factories of some Apple suppliers, things have not always been so shiny and cool. 

Many of us are entrepreneurs ourselves, and thus appreciate very intimately how hard it can be to communicate effectively in an overcrowded attention economy. Yet we need to engage the process, and well, to give our gifts and sustain our livelihoods. Marketing and branding (whether by for-profits, non-profits, or individuals) is not an option in the logic of our media-saturated world. Whether we intentionally seek to brand and market ourselves or not, we are branding and marketing ourselves. Even our mundane interactions, like looking for work, applying to school, or posting updates on Facebook, tell a story about who we are and our assumptions about the world. They assign us an economic value. And they raise questions, such as: What are these stories actually saying? How authentic or true are they? How do they affect our lives? And what are their effects on the larger conscious ecosystems of which we’re a part?

Within integral circles, we’ve often heard from people who are cynical and fed up with the number and type of marketing emails and other promotions they are exposed to on a daily basis from various integral organizations, teachers, authors, and so on. Others cast a more academic and critical-theoretical gaze on these communications, discerning the hidden (or not-so-hidden) agendas and ideological assumptions embedded therein. Others express discomfort with the cost of entry to some of the offerings.

So we’ve been thinking about these questions, particularly as they relate to our writing and teaching projects together. We started writing a “serious” article on the subject, but then it occurred to us that it might be more fun for us, and for you, to take a different approach. Naturally, we decided to make a computer-animated cartoon video! (We were inspired once again by the Integral Trollz.) Please take this video as our (initial) response to the discussions — on Facebook and Twitter, in various blog posts (including in the comment thread on “Occupy Integral!”), and in personal conversations — that have raised concerns about how the monetization of integral consciousness is affecting the integral community. Our book will take the conversation deeper.

We’re grateful to critical integral theorist Daniel Gustav Anderson, who coined the phrase “Integral ShamWow.” We also want to point people to Ken Wilber’s essay “Right Bucks”, which, though written many years ago, is just as relevant today. Finally, in the video we make reference to the cultural philosopher Slavoj Žižek, alluding to his critiques of Conscious Capitalism and Western Buddhism.

We believe the Integral Revolution will involve creating new economic and communication structures (on many scales, from local to global to virtual) that are more empowering, less alienating, and more inclusive. We respect and seek to address some of the critiques of capitalism, marketing, and ideology that some express; but we also find them lacking when it comes to operationalizing real change in the messy world in which we must make our way. Some forms of criticism, when they harden into a merely reflexive (and un-self-critical) generalized cynical attitude, can tend to disempower authentic change agents. On the other hand, uncritically recreating the same structures and repeating the patterns of “late capitalism” is no recipe for evolutionary transformation either. Thus intelligent, compassionate criticism is indispensable, and we welcome it.

Ultimately, we see an opportunity for our movement to give birth to an Integral Commons that is bigger than our economic and marketing exchanges, yet inclusive of them, so that while our community coheres more strongly, our marketplace grows and thrives too. We intend to say more about this idea in future posts, and of course in our book.

This is a living consideration, so it will go on. We don’t presume to have fully answered or resolved all the issues we raise. But we hope we’re shining a light on some of the mostly unspoken tensions in our community with this video—and maybe lightening things up and sharing some grins along the way.

Enjoy! And please share it widely :)


Thanks Terry & Marco, for your highly clarifying and discriminating creativity !  Much love & appreciation.

Fantastic beat ! I would like to apprentice whilst you
amend your web site, how could i subscribe for a weblog web
site? The account helped me a acceptable deal. I have been a little bit familiar of this
your broadcast provided shiny clear idea

Kick ass job guys! You are really moving the conversation in the right direction. If I might add or make a suggestion, you might also want to explore the roots of integral & its relationship to the American culture.

This is cute, funny, and an imaginative way of addressing the topic...  made me smile. Hugs!


Great job Terry and Marco. Thanks for thinking aloud about these issues in public. I totally hear you...

much love,


Thanks Terry and Marco! I like the way you held and honored the different perspectives on this issue, creating a space for a more inclusive and less divisive conversation to take place. I especially appreciate Terry's perspective that embracing the intention to evolve requires that we endure some hypocracy as we attempt to give birth to what wants to emerge. To me, this is the essence of the issue. I totally respect those who choose to pursue evolutionary unfolding outside the dominant political and economic structures. Those efforts are essential. But so too are the efforts of those who are seeing to work within those structures to go beyond them. Both approaches are needed, and they should inform each other rather then be in seeming conflict.

Go Terry!  that character does resemble you. And iIf people want free spiritual growth, let them buy "Integral Life Practices" and start a local group around it.

Terry and Marco - I love that you are engaging (and therefore enacting in a way too) the integral community in dialogue about matters of embodied action.  I find this movement towards an evolutionary ethics of practice so refreshing and enlivening.  Thanks for keeping us lauging too.  

I really like the idea of an integral commons - thanks for contributing to it.

Occupy yourselves. Be the 100 %!

thank you for this very silly ,very sweet meeting of the generational minds.


It's getting through these very blocks, and creating affectionate bonds of connection and cooperation across personality, age and stage, and preference that will develop Integral thinkers into an actual community of people who deeply appreciate each other.  It's sounds simple, but when folks like each other, very cool things happen.